Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2 Disc Special Edition) [2007] | ![Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2 Disc Special Edition) [2007]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51D6g5MxvIL._SL75_.jpg)
 enlarge | Actors: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Ralph Fiennes, Robbie Coltrane
Studio: Warner Home Video
Category: DVD
List Price: £25.99
Buy New: £4.50
You Save: £21.49 (83%)
New (24) Used (31) Collectible (1) from £3.20
Avg. Customer Rating:  97 reviews
Sales Rank: 43
Format: Pal
Languages: English (Original Language), Polish (Original Language)
Rating: Suitable for 12 years and over
Number Of Items: 2
Running Time: 138
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3
Dimensions (in): 7.3 x 5.4 x 0.7
EAN: 7321902174921
ASIN: B000VPMMGO
Theatrical Release Date: 2007
Release Date: November 12, 2007
Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
Condition: never opened, still wrapped
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.co.uk Review
While many movie franchises slide as they reach their later instalments, the Harry Potter films just keep getting better. The latest, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is easily the darkest of the series to date, and it's also one of the best. For while it could easily have been little more than a holding film to set up the big encounters to come in the last two instalments of the series, it's to the credit of British director David Yates that the end result is really very good. It finds Harry coming under suspicion from his wizarding colleagues, who don't believe his claims that the evil Lord Voldermort has returned. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix thus finds its title character on the backfoot for much of its running time, with a select band who firmly believe his story, and very powerful figures who don't. Where the movie of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix excels though is in its three trump cards. Number one is a far tighter script than we're used to with Potter films, which, combined with trump card number two--the aforementioned David Yates behind the camera--cuts much of the slavish loyalty to the text away in favour of a film with real momentum. The third, and best, card though is the casting of Imelda Staunton as Professor Dolores Umbridge, who simply flies away with every scene she's in. It's a superb performance, and the film is poorer whenever she's not on screen. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is not a film without a few problems, certainly: it's a fair criticism that not too much actually happens, and one or two bits feel superfluous. But it overrides its problems with ease, to emerge as a compelling, highly enjoyable family film, which will leave you salivating for the Christmas 2008 release of movie number six in the series. --Simon Brew
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 92 more reviews...
 Enough Dross to Ensure Success. July 9, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Any writer of a film's 97th review, unless he' so confident in the drawing-appeal of his offering's title, that he thinks it shall be the first one to be read, should be confident, and in this case pleased, that his subject is known to well to the reader not to spare him the need to inflict on him the same trash that Warner's is still peddeling to viewers; for that, I'm grateful.
Let me help you; if what this film contains appeals to you, a London Transport 'bus journey should provide the same types of incidents and horrors that this awfullness provides for a fraction of the cost, albeit still too much; and would also offer the type of personal involvement, rather than any registrable measurements of active thinking, that is so necessary for museums to provide before they can receive a Lottery grant, or that couldn't be found in your local Playstation store: din; facial gimmacing; retarded speach; slang; fluently muttering, un-developed minds; tumult; a passion of aimlessness; a belieflessness in everything and anything except in the un-proveable or un-knowable or the latest fashion; cliches of behaviour and language and action and thought, comporable in riches to the content of an exploded balloon, all these are to be found either here, or, as I have already recommended, in the transport that you may find yourself unluckilly being conveyed in on the way to experience more of the same on the screen, or, in the adjoining stall.
Confident of this good advice going to waste, I'm convinced of this Review's title, as this seems to be what the public wants, if it ever has known without being told, since it supplies so much of it free of charge itself, before being dispersed by those fortunate enough to be able to afford a Mosquitto alarm.
Like all the films in this series, when the staying power of it's 'charms' persuades the then enlightened buyer to place it on the shelf of his local charity shop, at least it will allow you to buy it for deliberate burial in the corporation dust cart; there's nothing like an altruistic public act, there's no place like home for this disc, and at least some good shall have come of it all.
 another entertaing installment June 7, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
again another entertaining installment in the entertaining harry potter series.the three leads are really starting to mature in to good young actors
 A successful adaptation of the book May 5, 2008
I have read some very derogatory reviews of this film here, which were invariably hugely unfair, as they seem to be from people who cannot bear the thought of the books undergoing editing to make them into manageable films.
The reason I am so impressed with this film in particular was that it makes those changes so effectively. I love the books, and of course if you want the true Harry Potter experience then you should read those rather than watch the films, but I am realistic enough to understand that, with almost any book, there are changes and cuts that need to be made in order for it to work on screen, and I think that to a large extent this film succeeds.
The book upon which this is based is arguably the weakest of the series, it is by far the longest but does not have the clear and direct plot device that the first 4 books have, so the result is that, while it is still a great read, it is definitely a bit too sprawling, and could do with some pruning.
To this end, the filmmakers have taken the longest book of the series, and produced the shortest film of the series so far. To do so without really losing the important aspects of the story is quite an achievement.
David Yates, who came to my attention first as the director of the excellent TV series State of Play, shows a fine grasp of both the dramatic and humourous parts of Harry Potter. Lord Voldemort is back, but the Ministry of Magic is doing its very best to make life difficult for Harry and Dumbledore, because it would much rather live in blissful ignorance than confront the alarming truth. As such, the meat of the story is much darker than the previous ones, as this is no longer just a schoolboy adventure for Harry, but a very serious fight against both an oppresive authority, who try to isolate him from the rest of the wizarding world, and Lord Voldemort.
The Ministry of Magic set is beautifully realised, and the Spanish Inquisition-like robes of the court bring a suitably menacing air to Harry's trial at the start of the film, and sets the tone for the further struggles Harry will face in the film.
The two main plotlines of the film are the Ministry's interference at Hogwarts, and Harry's visions of what Voldemort is doing.
The former plotline involves Dolores Umbridge, of the Ministry, taking up the post of Defence Against the Dark Arts teacher at Hogwarts, and rapidly initiating a despotic regime, with Ministry approval, of oppression of those who dare to disagree with official policy. Imelda Staunton is quite well suited to the role, but there certainly isn't quite the same air of petty vindictiveness and malevolence about the character as their is in the films, which is perhaps a shame, but the message certainly gets across that she is a very nasty piece of work indeed - and representative of the digraceful attitude of those in power, who are too attached and in love with that power to acknowledge anything that might threaten it.
In an attempt to fight back, Harry, Ron and Hermione start a secret Defence group, where Harry teaches any students who would like to learn how to defend themselves better, as Umbridge refuses to teach them any defensive magic. I think the film captures the sense of rebellion about this group very well, and shows that there is always value in standing up for what is right, even if it may land you in further trouble.
Harry's visions of Voldemort, and his unwillingness to do anything to stop them, eventually lead to the exciting set-piece ending of the film, a magical battle of a scale never seen before in the films at the Ministry of Magic, and again I think the action is handled very well, we do get a sense of the speed and danger of the fight, capped with the tantalising duel between Dumbledore and Voldemort, which again is pretty well done. The scene in which Harry is fighting being possessed is, in my opinion, very moving, and Daniel Radcliffe seems to have improved considerably as an actor for this film.
The acting in general is fine - as I said, I think Radcliffe has improved, Rupert Grint continues to do a good job with his natural comic ability as Ron, but Emma Watson is a bit too hammy as Hermione. Evanna Lynch is convincingly oddball as Luna Lovegood, and I think Matthew Lewis as Neville Longbottom also gives a creditable performance. The Phelps twins are much better in this one as well, and I thoroughly enjoyed seeing the Weasley twins' chaotic exit from Hogwarts.
Of course, it isn't a perfect film - the problem with converting a series as rich as Harry Potter into films is that you will end up with important characters being reduced to little more than cameos, with no real chance to develop or shine. Dumbledore is probably the most significant character who suffers in this way, as his role and paternal bonding with Harry is no where near as strong in the films as in the books, and the role is underwritten, but it is not a major issue, and his important moments in this film are still handled pretty well.
All in all, this is probably my joint favourite (with Prisoner of Azkaban) film so far, and considering how much better the Prisoner of Azkaban book is to the Order of the Phoenix, that is very high praise. I feel that there are very serious 'adult' themes in this film - the fight for the truth, standing up for what is right, coping with isolation and loss, and that those themes are put across very well. An excellent film.
 Brill April 15, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Hi i'm the daughter or Corene. I like this film. I think its really gd. Its one of my fave films. My dads fave is the 3rd one.!!
U I would bi it if i was u. If you have little ones then i wouldn't let them watch it by there selths (especislly if it's the first time they have ever watch it). Bi Bi
XXXXX
I suspect nargals are behind it. April 11, 2008
5 out of 5 found this review helpful
Based on the fifth book in J.K Rowling's "Harry Potter" series, "The Order of the Phoenix" first hit the big screen in 2007. The film opens with the end of the summer holidays approaching, in a playground close to the Dursley family home. Harry and Dudley are enjoying a little verbal sparring, which is unfortunately brought to a sharpish end when a group of Dementors attack the pair. Harry naturally performs the Patronus. However, this leads to a rapidly delivered letter from the Ministry, threatening our young hero with expulsion - although the cavalry, led by Moody and Tonks, aren't long in arriving. Harry is quickly escorted to 12 Grimmauld Place - the ancestral home of the Black family and headquarters to the Order of the Phoenix.
The Order of the Phoenix is a secret society formed by Dumbledore, consisting of people who had fought Voldemort previously. Its members include Mr and Mrs Weasley, Tonks, Professor Lupin, Mad Eye Mooney and Harry's godfather, Sirius. Harry's parents were also members, and Harry is quite keen to join the fight. However, it soon becomes clear there are differences of opinion within the Order on how much Harry should be involved - with his age being only a partial concern. Sirius, naturally, believes Harry should be told everything...however, it appears he's been kept in the dark on Dumbledore's instructions. Still, Harry is relieved to learn the threat of expulsion has been withdrawn - pending a hearing at the Ministry.
It proves to be a tough year for Harry. This year, he's due to sit his OWLs - wizard's exams - so his workload has increased dramatically. Things aren't made any easier by the series of nightmares he suffers from - generally centred around Voldemort. Furthermore, after the events outlined in "The Goblet of Fire", both Harry and Dumbledore are being viewed with scorn by the Ministry of Magic and the Daily Prophet. Neither organisation is willing to believe that Voldemort is back, fully recovered. Therefore, they're attacking anyone who says differently - Harry and Dumbledore are the two biggest targets. (Dumbledore reckons Fudge is anywhere but in his right mind - largely due to fear). As a result, it's barely a surprise that the Ministry decide to interfere at Hogwarts. Dolores Umbridge, a Ministry employee who is devoted to Fudge is appointed to the staff as Defence Against the Dark Arts teacher. She proves to be an absolute nightmare : she loves pink, squeaks a great deal, oozes insincerity and inspires more contempt than even Malfoy. As the year progresses, she increasingly interferes with the running of Hogwarts, and bullying anyone she feels isn't following the party line. Additionally her teaching is woefully inadequate. She believes a purely theoretical approach to the Defence Against the Dark Arts will be sufficient as, she claims, there are no Dark Wizards the pupils need to defend themselves from.
Harry feels a real sense of isolation during the year - Dumbledore appears to be avoiding him, while Hagrid is missing for long stretches. Some of the other pupils feel his claims about Voldemort are making their lives unnecessarily complicated and, at times, he even pushes Ron and Hermione away. In fact, at times his letters to Sirius seem to be his only way of getting things off his chest. However, it's not all bad - he makes some nifty progress on the Cho front, and he also finds a new friend in Luna Lovegood. Luna, played by Evanna Lynch, totally steals the show. Luna is something of a conspiracy theorist and is picked on and gossiped about behind her back. However, for all the apparent ditziness, she occasionally gets things that no-one else does and is quite clever in an un-Hermione sort of way. She's also able to get through Harry's defences and offer him a bit of help and support just when he needs it the most.
Unsurprisingly, given the length of the book, not everything makes it into the film. Despite the fact there are OWLs on the horizon, nobody - not even Hermione - seems to be remotely concerned. There's no Quidditch and a little more time spent on Neville would have been nice. While Harry made big progress with Cho, I thought it odd that the post-mistletoe events were brushed over. However, the film is hugely enjoyable : in addition to Luna, Tonks is gorgeous, Gary Oldman was great as Sirius and Helena Bonham Carter was outstanding in her too-brief appearance as Bellatrix. (Hopefully, we'll get much more in the films to come). Some of the sets are fantastic too : Grimmauld Place is very stylish in a tatty and dusty sort of way, while the Ministry is hugely impressive. Great stuff overall, certainly recommended.
|
|
|
