|
Sense & Sensibility : Complete BBC Series [2008] | ![Sense & Sensibility : Complete BBC Series [2008]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51DiGkjrFIL._SL75_.jpg)
 enlarge | Actors: Charity Wakefield, Hattie Morahan, David Morrissey
Studio: 2 Entertain Video
Category: DVD
List Price: £19.99
Buy New: £11.69
You Save: £8.30 (42%)
New (20) from £11.69
Avg. Customer Rating:  31 reviews
Sales Rank: 722
Format: Colour, Pal
Language: English (Original Language)
Rating: Universal, suitable for all
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.1
Dimensions (in): 7.6 x 5.4 x 0.6
EAN: 5014503253325
ASIN: B001061UPM
Theatrical Release Date: 2008
Release Date: January 14, 2008
Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
Condition: Brand New and Fully Guaranteed - Over 90% of orders are dispatched same day or next day by First Class post. Please note Danish customers may incur custom charges.
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.co.uk review
From the pen of Andrew Davies, the man who's brought some of the finest literary adaptations to the small screen in recent years, comes the BBC's new take on Jane Austen's Sense & Sensibility. Running across three episodes, it proves to be as much as a sumptuous treat as much of Davies' previous endeavours. Austen's story of the Dashwood sisters and a romance with John Willoughby is a familiar one (and it was realised quite brilliantly in Ang Lee's film adaptation in 1996), and so it's left to the super cast and terrific production values to convince audiences to dip into Sense & Sensibility again. Fortunately, the production delivers with consummate ease. Much of the credit for Sense & Sensibility's success lies in its excellent cast. David Morrissey, Mark Williams, Janet McTeer and Charity Wakefield are among the many strong performers, and they're matched by equally impressive work behind the camera too. There's an argument whether it manages to eclipse the 1996 filmed version (for which Emma Thompson took home an Oscar), but it's perhaps to best see them as companion pieces. And truthfully, you're not going to be disappointed with either. Because once again, the BBC has brought further life to a tale told many times before, and its production of Sense & Sensibility is set to be enjoyed for many years to come. --Jon Foster
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 26 more reviews...
 Deja vu July 20, 2008
Pride and Prejudice is the classic that made me a period drama fan over 10 years ago. i have been devouring books and dvd's ever since. (importing what i can't get my hands on in the Netherlands)
I'm always eager for new adaptations, and have 3 versions of Jane Eyre alone. the more the merrier is my motto!
But i was disappointed with this version. Yes, it was well made. And it was lovely to see the book come to life over a few hours time, and not over Ang Lee's 130 minutes. In this way, one can do the novel more justice.
But i often found myself longing for Ang Lee's S&S. (which of course is not perfect either) More than that, i often found myself reminded of it. The conversation between Mr and Mrs. Dashwood in the carriage, about his dead fathers wish for instance.
Or the cottage by the sea. it sometimes looked like an ode to Ang Lee and Emma Thompson's script!
I missed the vigour of Mrs Jennings and John Middleton.
The actress playing Elinor was cast wonderfully, but the tone of het voice, her pronounciation often reminded me of Emma Thompson.
Marianne was well cast to, but didn't seem to add something new to Kate Winslet. Edward Ferrars was wonderfully cast, after all, in the '95 version, one cannot see edward, one sees Hugh Grant!
contrary to another reviewer, i didn't like Morissey as Brandon at all! i just did not find him sympathetic or attractive. (though i did love his performance in 'our mutual friend').Willoughby on the other hand, was not handsome/sexy enough, and had a boyish, unreliable look to him.
he seemed terribly Byronic to me, with 'trouble' spelt all over him. that would imply that Marianne was uncounsciously or even consciously plotting her own downfall. (interesting theory, as she does wish to live the life of a romantic heroine...) Anyways, it's much more shocking when you don't see it coming. (I must admit, it took me a few years to reconcile myself to Marianne marying Brandon at all, i was 17 when i first saw it myself) I don't mind the erotic touches at all though, i think that does add realism and depth. Jane Austen does require one to read between the lines.
On the whole, i was expecting more added value. what i found was a lot of repitition. It was good, it was solid. 3 stars are certainly earned. But i was hoping for so much more. But watch it, by all means.
Good but not great July 3, 2008
I'll do this in list form, in no particular order!
Things I liked:
The Steele sisters - Anne in particular is hilarious; the awful chattering stupidity Austen endowed her with is really brought out in her first few scenes. However, she becomes a bit hammy in her final scene. I wish they'd kept in the scene in the book where she tells an outraged Elinor that "I only stood at the door and heard what I could. And I am sure that Lucy would have done just the same by me; for a year or two back, when Martha Sharpe and I had so many secrets together, she never made any bones of hiding in a closet, or behind a chimney board...". Lucy is pretty good, although a little inconsistent; she seems genuinely friendly in some scenes, and knowing in others.
The cinematography - gorgeous scenes of rugged Devon in the winter.
Margaret - Just like in the Emma Thompson version, she's fleshed out and brings a touch of light comedy by always popping up from some hidden nook. Just the right side of annoying; she never becomes a bratty film kid.
Fanny Dashwood - Loved the scene where she persuades her husband not to "rob little Harry" to give his sisters an allowance. Little Harry, of course, is a repellent little brat always sucking on something sweet. Fanny is smugly hostile throughout.
The costumes - Not as stiff and "bonnetty" as usual, especially Marianne's 'Romantic' wardrobe which at times almost looked like it could fit in nowadays on a modern-day Marianne. Each character's costume 'spoke' about their character, without being brash.
Marianne - suitably 'teenage' and warm.
The lack of stunningly beautiful actors - apart from a rather hunky Edward Ferrars, who gets a special "Violently chopping wood in a wet shirt" scene, the cast are normal looking rather than unrealistically beautiful.
The accents - or rather, lack of the usual period drama "cut-gless" accent. The characters are the gentry rather than the nobility, and they speak with rather average accents - the Miss Steeles even sport a West Country one.
The actors looked the right age, which gave it a freshness - in the Emma Thompson version, everyone but Marianne looks at least half a generation too old.
...
Things that could have been better:
More of the Palmers, please! Mr. Palmer looked the part, a big man with bushy black eyebrows, small dark eyes and pale skin. His character, however, was reduced to "man behind newspaper". Charlotte Palmer hardly spoke either, although I did like her relationship with Mrs. Jennings.
Elinor - I found her a bit flat. Her facial expressions seemed to be limited to "concerned" and "wide-eyed in disbelief", and she didn't make the most of her voice, which was rather unvaried and somewhat louder than I'd imagined Elinor to be. I agree with the reviewer who says that they confused "restrained" with "mundane".
Mrs. Dashwood - I clearly missed something, looking at the amount of reviews who consider her the best performance. I found her rather unexpressive, although not particularly bad.
The sex scene at the start - the very first scene is of Willoughby's seduction of young Miss Williams. Apart from not being in keeping with the tone of the novel, it's really disjointed. Nothing more is even heard about the seduction until at least episode 2. If you only saw episode 1, you'd be really puzzled about who exactly was getting it on with whom at the start.
The lack of original dialogue - and the replacement doesn't really sparkle.
....
Overall, I quite enjoyed it but for me, this adaptation is more something to watch on TV in three episodes when it's on, rather than rent out and sit down and watch all in one go. I did enjoy it slightly more than the Emma Thompson version though. It was more relatable, less 'period drama'. However, I don't think either version captures the sparkling finesse of the book.
Cuts made to what was shown on television April 22, 2008
3 out of 4 found this review helpful
I must say that I prefer this version over the Emma Thompson/Kate Winslet version. The actors are younger overall and I found this portrayal of Col. Brandon far more believable.
My disappointment comes with the omission of many of the small incidental scenes which are cut from the DVD. While these small scenes are perhaps not true to the novel, they add richness and depth to the characters, their relationships, their struggles and ultimately their triumphs.
If I had known these scenes were going to be cut from the DVD, I would not have made the purchase.
 Much better that the film! April 16, 2008
2 out of 3 found this review helpful
This adaptation took me by surprise. I did enjoy the film and I can't dispute the acting abililties of Hugh Grant and Emma Thompson, however, for me this BBC version showed more character and insight into Jane Austen's words than any previous adaptation. The relationship and contrast of characters between Elinor and Marianne was quite touching, and the real humour that Jane Austen writes so cleverly, was electric throughout. One minute I was laughing, the next crying and at the end SOBBING! Truly marvellous, and I would recommend it to anyone!
Be sensible buy this version April 14, 2008
2 out of 3 found this review helpful
This was an absolute delight from beginning to end. The delicious and agonising wait between the couples was perfectly balanced against a stimulating background of society and its expectations during this period of time. I was never happy with Hugh Grants attempts to interpret an Austen gent as he has such a minutae of warmth to call upon so the gorgeous Dan Stevens as Edward Ferrars was a blessing.
Elinor and Marianne were played to a fine art by Hattie Morahan and Charity Wakefield. Indeed, the cast were chosen exceptionally well and I do not think this version could ever be improved upon.
Highly recommended for its beautiful scenery, wonderful directing, acting and casting. A must for the Austen fan.
|
|
|
| |
